Quantcast
breaking news

Stateliners Agree: No Budget Equals No Pay in Washington, D.C.

By: Matt Mershon
Updated: January 18, 2013
watch video

ROCKFORD - It's an old expression: hard work pays off.  However if you do no work, should you still get paid?  Some house republican leaders say if our nation's leaders can't reach a deal on the budget that our representation in Washington shouldn't get paid.  They've laid the platform for a debt-ceiling extension with that caveat that democrats come to an agreeance on the nation's budget.  House republicans plan to introduce the legislation next week.

 

"It's a sad state of affairs if the only way that you can get the United States Congress today to do something is to threaten to take money out of their wallet," said Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada.  Heller is the author of the "No Budget, No Pay" bill that originally surfaced in the house back in 2011.  The bill sheds a sad light on the political indifference in Washington, and Stateliners agree it's something we should seriously consider.

 

"They're not doing what we need them to do even though we elected them into office," said Cheryl Schmidt expressing her support for the bill.

 

Carla Shewmon says her husband might lose his job if the Belvidere School district doesn't balance their budget. 

 

"Let them see what it's like to go without getting money like a lot of us other people are doing," said Shewmon.

 

Chester Zapatka is a maintenance man and says he doesn't get paid when he doesn't work.

 

"If they're not doing their job they shouldn't get paid either," said Zapatka.

 

The "No Budget, No Pay" bill stems from the organization called No Labels, a bipartisan group urging today's politicians to put party differences aside.  On Friday, House Speaker John Boehner (R) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R) announced their support for the plan.  Representative Adam Kinzinger (R) is a member of the No Labels organization and he says he's throwing his support behind, "No Budget, No Pay," too.

 

"I wish we never had to go to this kind of length but again over the last four years we haven't been able to get a budget out of the Senate and that's required by law," said Rep. Kinzinger. 

 

"Every year you're supposed to produce a budget on April 15th, so I think we have to take an unfortunately drastic step in order to try and guarantee that the Senate actually does its job."

 

Since Representative Cheri Bustos (D) is a newcomer to Congress, she isn't familiar with the "No Budget, No Pay," proposal, however she did release this statement:

 

"Like middle class families do across our region, I believe that Congress needs to do its job by passing a budget and living within it.  That's what I support a 10% pay cut for members of Congress and no pay raises until lawmakers get their act together and pass a budget."

 

If the "No Budget, No Pay" measure were to pass, the nation's debt deadline would change from mid-February to mid-April, giving legislators more time to prevent default on America's loans and pass a balanced budget.

 

Comments

One, I find it odd that two Paul G's are commenting on this article, and two, while it folks might want congress to not get paid, they can't change their pay mid-term, that would be unconstitutional. As in the case of many federal, state and local governments, pay for certain elected officials may only be changed at specified times. In the case of congress, the 27th amendment prohibits any law that modifies the salary of members of the Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of term. You would think that congressional leaders would know basic constitutional law, but no. Rather than making campaign speeches about what will and won't happen regarding the debt ceiling, our congressional leaders should be sitting down at the table discussing options for solving the problem. Instead they are crafting nice little sound bites for the media. As far as the federal law about not passing a budget, the constitution trumps any self-imposed congressional restraints. We're not talking future looking budgets here, we're talking about paying existing bills, and the constitution requires congress to pay its outstanding bills. So debt ceiling or not, we we are obligated to pay our existing bills. Congress should spend less time on TV and more time in committee working out the problem.

Paul G. January 19, 2013 at 11:41 am



The federal government is totally out of control. Not only should they forfeit their pay for not passing a budget in violation of existing federal law they should be docked if they do not balance the budget. When they are involved in diverting funds such as Social Security at the federal level or pension funds in Illinois they need to held individually accountable. This administration has never passed a budget, they continue to spend a trillion dollars a year more than we take in and pledges to do more of the same.

Paul G. January 19, 2013 at 10:33 am



The federal government is totally out of control. Not only should they forfeit their pay for not passing a budget in violation of existing federal law they should be docked if they do not balance the budget. When they are involved in diverting funds such as Social Security at the federal level or pension funds in Illinois they need to held individually accountable. This administration has never passed a budget, they continue to spend a trillion dollars a year more than we take in and pledges to do more of the same.

Paul G. January 19, 2013 at 10:33 am

Readers Feel...

hello
 
 
 
 
 
©1998 - 2013 Mystateline.com
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
All Rights Reserved