Quantcast
breaking news

Gay Marriage Has ZERO Support from Stateline Representatives

By: Matt Mershon
Updated: February 15, 2013
watch video

ROCKFORD - With the Illinois senate passing their gay marriage bill on Thursday, the bill will now head to the house for their approval.  Governor Pat Quinn (D) says if the bill got to his desk he would sign it into law.  But representatives in the Stateline are giving an overwhelming "no" to the possibility of same-sex couples being able to tie the knot. 

 

Six legislators represent voters in the Stateline region from Galena to Belvidere, Rockford to DeKalb - all of them say they will not support Senate Bill 10.  Most legislators have differing reasons as to why they won't vote for gay marriage.

 

Representative John Cabello (R - 68th District) cites his faith as a Roman Catholic as part of his reasoning for saying no to the bill.

 

"I'm afraid that this bill may have some things tied to it, where some of the amendments are going to force churches to perform some of these marriages that go against their own doctrines," said Cabello.

 

Legislator representing the Freeport region, Jim Sacia (R - 89th District), claims it's verbiage - the word "marriage" - that doesn't settle well with him.

 

"I have no issue with same-sex couples getting together, having their unions, but I simply don't believe it should be called marriage," said Sacia.

 

Rochelle's representative, Tom Demmer (R - 90th District), says it's tradition that marriage has simple always been between a man and a woman.

 

"I think that marriage predates government itself and I don't feel that it's our place to change that now," said Demmer.

 

Representative Joe Sosnowski (R - 69th District) released this statement today regarding his stance on the proposed gay marriage bill:

"I believe that the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman, and I do not support any change to that definition.  Our legislative time should be spent fixing our horrible budget and creating opportunities for people to work and support their families."

Not even party lines will sway Stateline legislators.  Democrat, Representative Chuck Jefferson (D - 67th District), says he was brought up believing that marriage is to be between a male and female.  However Jefferson says his beliefs didn't play as much of a role in his decision to say no to gay marriage as much as his constituents beliefs did.

"My constituents, on a daily basis, have called in saying that this is something that they do not support and as a result of that, they've helped me make up my mind," said Jefferson.

Similarly, Bob Pritchard (R - 70th District) says he too has been listening to his constituents and he as well will say no to gay marriage.  Pritchard says he supports the idea of equal rights for all, a claim the pro-gay marriage movement says Illinois' current civil union law doesn't provide. 

"If there's a problem with that bill [the civil union bill], that there aren't benefits accruing to the spouse of same-sex couples, than I think we ought to look at that," said Pritchard.

Comments

@ Robbin - same-[censored] marriage doesn't hurt anyone. If all you who waste your energy on ensuring gays can't marry would spend that energy on making abortions illegal (kills innocent babies) which I believe "thou shalt not kill" is considered a sin. Seems to me peoples priorities are all [censored] up,

barts61 b. February 19, 2013 at 7:23 pm



barts61 b. you are right, we are all sinners for one reason or another; the difference is that we are not trying to legalize our sin.

Robbin B. February 19, 2013 at 12:14 pm



Trustworthy - this is not a "free" country, as you state, because if it was gays would be allowed to marry.

barts61 b. February 17, 2013 at 7:08 pm



Trustworthy - this is not a "free" country, as you state, because if it was gays would be allowed to marry.

barts61 b. February 17, 2013 at 7:07 pm



@barts61...This is a free country and I am entitled to state my opinion. I am against anything called gay "marriage". So there. I am also agnostic so the bible does not affect my opinion in any way.

trustworthy t. February 17, 2013 at 11:20 am



@Trustworthy - WOW! What I find disgusting are those who pick and choose what is & isn't immoral (from the Bible). I'm sure you are doing immoral things that are listed there.

barts61 b. February 16, 2013 at 7:41 pm



I am in agreement with those who will vote against this bill. Gay marriage is not a marriage, it could be a union of some kind that would afford each partner a say in medical issues or inheritance matters. But the most disgusting thing is when a man refers to his partner as his "wife". Wife is a woman, not a man. Gay [censored] is a totally immoral act. I say NO to any gay marriage bill in the state of Illinois

trustworthy t. February 16, 2013 at 5:40 pm



Oops, I meant pass this bill.

kathy h. February 16, 2013 at 10:23 am



I would like to know exactly HOW MANY stateliners contacted these legislators and stated they did not want them to pay this bill. Was it 5, 50, or 500? It makes a difference if there were only 15 people that actually stated they did not want the bill passed. I love it when politicians say they made their decisions based on what their constituents wanted!! Notice it only matters when the legislator WANTS it to matter. SHAME on these legislators for HIDING behind these "statements". Everyone deserves the right to love and be loved. Everyone's partner has the right to receive benefits and have the rights to make decisions if one is extremely ill. I am a heterosexual who believes in the rights of ALL people. Isn't that what our Constitution and the Bill of Rights is all about, LEGISLATORS??

kathy h. February 16, 2013 at 10:17 am



Gee, there's a surprise - this town doesn't support gay rights. They don't support a whole lot of minorities except giving illegal aliens rights they don't deserve.

barts61 b. February 16, 2013 at 9:43 am

Readers Feel...

hello
 
 
 
 
 
©1998 - 2013 Mystateline.com
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
All Rights Reserved